Lexxington
DeutschSign inPilot access

Data core

The data core.

Measured, dated, with its origin.

Official statutes and court decisions, every original archived, every version kept, every relationship sourced. This page states what we have, how we count and what is still missing.

Request data access
102,896federal provisions97 % of official statutes and regulations captured
15,451federal court decisions18 % of the official catalogue, daily import
394,741searchable passageswith full-text and semantic search
20,212interactive learning casesacross seven legal systems

As of 5 November 2026. Measured, not estimated.

Jurisdictions

Seven legal systems.

Germany is the launch market. The other six have learning content; we open up their official sources one after another, each with its own review of licence and access rules.

DELaunch market

Germany

Civil law, codified

Official sources
On record, daily
Learning cases
11,036
AT

Austria

Civil law, codified

Official sources
Planned
Learning cases
1,078
CH

Switzerland

Civil law, codified

Official sources
Planned
Learning cases
1,067
US

United States

Common law, federal and state

Official sources
Planned
Learning cases
4,307
CA

Canada

Common law, civil law in Québec

Official sources
Planned
Learning cases
934
UK

England and Wales

Common law

Official sources
Planned
Learning cases
848
AU

Australia

Common law, federal and state

Official sources
Planned
Learning cases
942

Data path

How a record is made.

A service runs around the clock: it reconciles the official catalogues, fetches new documents, checks them and adopts only what passes every check.

  1. 1

    Collect

    Reconcile official catalogues daily, archive every original unchanged.

  2. 2

    Validate

    Check format, required fields and metadata. Contradictions go to review.

  3. 3

    Version

    Every version is kept, retrieval and entry into force kept apart.

  4. 4

    Link

    Statute, provision, court and decision as objects with sourced links.

  5. 5

    Deliver

    Research, learning app and data access read the same verified record.

One record

This is what a provision looks like.

Wording, source, archived original and the state of the time check, visible to every application that uses the record.

How we count

What the figures mean.

Provisions

Individual sections and articles with their own wording. One statute consists of many provisions.

Statutes and regulations

Official source files of federal law. A small share is re-checked after a failed fetch.

Decisions

Published federal court decisions with court, date, docket and ECLI from the original.

Citations

Machine-detected citations between documents. A citation is not yet a legal assessment.

Honest

What is still missing.

A data supplier is only as good as its honesty about gaps.

  • Validity in time

    Entry into force and repeal of historical versions are added from the sources. Until then we do not answer questions about earlier law.

    In progress
  • Citation network

    Links between documents are captured. Verified links between objects (provision cites provision, decision cites decision) follow.

    In progress
  • EU and state law

    TFEU, the Charter and the German state sources are reviewed and queued, but not yet on record.

    Planned
  • Other countries

    Austria, Switzerland, the US, Canada, England and Wales and Australia follow with their own sources and separate records.

    Planned

Data access.

For companies, publishers, research and public bodies: structured access to the record, with origin and version for every item.

Request data access