Technology
What is behind Lexxington
A knowledge base built from official sources, an ontology that links the syllabus with rules, decisions and exercises, and an AI tutor that names its sources. This page explains how it fits together and how far it has come.
From syllabus to exercise, linked
- Exam rulesWhat your jurisdiction tests
- Subject and topicHow the material is structured
- RuleThe provision in its wording
- DecisionHow courts apply the rule
- Lesson, card, question, caseHow you practise the topic
- Your progressWhat holds and where there is a gap
Knowledge base
How the knowledge base learns
Internally it is called Krake. Everything is a node in a network: exam rules and curricula lead to subjects, subjects to rules, rules to decisions, decisions to cases, questions and cards. Every answer you give flows back into the network as a signal.
The training loop
Where the network lacks exercises for an exam topic, new material is written. Every task is graded separately, every citation checked against the knowledge base, and only then approved. A fixed set of test questions measures whether it gets better.
- 1gap found
- 2task written
- 3independently checked
- 4citation checked
- 5approved
- 6measurably better
- 88 %
- substantively correct
- 80 %
- main rule cited
- 76 %
- rules found
First evaluation run, 25 test questions, as of 5 November 2026. Measured on Lexxi’s answers to fixed test questions; the figures rise or fall with every run.
Our own legal language model, trained on the knowledge base and the checked study content. Not in the app yet.
The knowledge base
Statutes and court decisions come from official sources, with version and origin. Internally this part is called Krake. The state per country:
- GermanyStatutes: Federal law (gesetze-im-internet.de); state law of Bavaria, Brandenburg, Saxony, North Rhine-Westphalia; more states in progress (running). Decisions: Federal courts (rechtsprechung-im-internet.de), imported daily (running).
- SwitzerlandStatutes: Federal law from Fedlex (in progress). Decisions: BGE and Federal Supreme Court (in progress).
- United StatesStatutes: United States Code, CFR, Federal Rules (govinfo.gov) (in progress). Decisions: Decisions via CourtListener, in progress (in progress).
- England and WalesStatutes: planned. Decisions: planned.
Germany, as of 5 November 2026: more than 100,000 provisions and more than 15,000 reviewed federal decisions. More under data coverage.
Exam rules and curricula
So the app knows what your exam covers, we read in the official exam rules and curricula, with version, period of validity and source.
- Germany17 exam rule sets, 1 faculty curriculum
- United States7 exam rule sets, 7 faculty curricula
- United Kingdom2 exam rule sets, 4 faculty curricula
- Switzerland9 exam rule sets, 7 faculty curricula
Counted from the documents we have read in. More follow.
The ontology
Everything in the app is a node in a network: exams, subjects, topics, rules, decisions, lessons, cards, questions and cases. The links say what belongs together. That is how the app can show the cases for a rule and tell you which topic of your exam you have not practised yet.
- Rules and decisionsmore than 10,000 rules and more than 11,000 decisions are linked to the study material.
- Exercisesmore than 20,000 cases, more than 8,000 questions, more than 4,500 cards and more than 3,000 lessons.
- Linksmore than 180,000 links, such as “decision applies rule” or “question practises topic”.
All courses together, network as of 5 November 2026.
Lexxi, the AI tutor
Lexxi answers questions about the material on the basis of the course content and the knowledge base, and names the rules and decisions the answer relies on. So you see not just an answer but where it comes from.
Lexxi can be wrong, like any AI system. That is why it shows sources: check them. Lexxi is a study aid, not legal advice.
How you learn with it
- Unlock step by stepLessons are split into sections. Each section sits behind a card: say it yourself first, then reveal. The learning path leads you on subject by subject.
- Spaced reviewCards and questions come back on a schedule: what holds comes back later, what is shaky sooner.
- Rules with case lawFrom the rule to the cases and decisions that apply it, and back.
- Timed practiceYour own answer against the clock, graded by structure, then the model answer.
- Progress and gapsBecause the app knows which topics belong to your exam, it shows you where you have not practised yet.
The current state in numbers
Counted from the course files when the page is built and rounded down. A case used in several courses counts once per country.
Frequently asked questions
Where do the statutes in Lexxington come from?
From official sources, such as gesetze-im-internet.de for German federal law. For Switzerland, the USA and the United Kingdom the import is being built; this page shows the state of each source.
What is the ontology?
A network of links: which exam requires which subject, which rule belongs to which topic, which decision applies which rule, and which question or case practises which topic. That is how the app knows what belongs together and where you still have gaps.
Can Lexxi invent rules?
Lexxi names the rules an answer relies on so you can check them. Like any AI system, Lexxi can be wrong. Lexxington is study material, not legal advice.
Are the figures on this page current?
They are counted from the course files and the data snapshot when the page is built, and rounded down. The German statute and decision snapshot is as of 5 November 2026.
Is everything complete?
No. The knowledge base keeps growing. What is still missing is marked as in progress or planned.
Lexxington for iPhone and iPad
Download it on the App Store. All content is included in the subscription in the app.
Facts and figures
Study content counted from the course files on every release, the knowledge base hourly from our pipeline. All figures rounded down. Knowledge base as of 5 November 2026.
- 770,000+
- legal documents in the knowledge base
- 2,300,000+
- text segments, linked by our own pipeline
- 19,000+
- cases
- 15,000+
- questions
- 6,000+
- flashcards
- 1,100+
- lessons
- 350+
- leading cases
- 59
- faculty curricula
- 35
- exam rules and syllabi
- over 340,000 documents, incl. over 110,000 decisions
- 107 statutes in the app library
- 12,000+ cases, 5,000+ questions
- 16 states
- over 320,000 documents, incl. over 4,800 decisions
- 34 statutes in the app library
- 5,000+ cases, 5,000+ questions
- 56 jurisdictions
- over 94,000 documents, incl. over 4,800 decisions
- 12 statutes in the app library
- 1,100+ cases, 1,400+ questions
- 26 cantons
- over 19,000 documents, incl. over 940 decisions
- 31 statutes in the app library
- 1,100+ cases, 2,500+ questions
How we check the content
Content is written and reviewed in a multi-step process with source checks. Our training loop:
- 1Find gaps
Where are questions, cards or cases missing for an exam topic?
- 2Write tasks
Each gap gets new material, with the rule and its source.
- 3Independent review
A second, separate check grades each task.
- 4Review queue
Anything that does not clearly pass waits for approval instead of going live.
Legal review by subject-matter authors is being set up (planned).
- Citation checker
Checks that every cited rule and decision exists in the knowledge base.
- Gold set
A fixed set of checked questions and answers as the benchmark.
- Nightly evaluation
Every night Lexxi and the content run against the gold set, so regressions show up.
- Second review
Sensitive items pass a second review before they appear.
What we are working on
Not in the app yet. Labelled clearly, so nothing is promised that does not exist.
- In developmentLX1, our own legal language model
Trained on our own knowledge base and checked study content.
- PlannedMore countries
The knowledge base grows beyond the four markets; new courses follow once material and checks are in place.
- PlannedTools for practice
Later, sourced research for working lawyers too, on the same knowledge base.
Built on the official exam rules and curricula
The content follows the exam rules of each German state and the curricula of 41 German law faculties, plus the rules in Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the US.
Law faculties in Germany (41)
- Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg
- Bucerius Law School – Hochschule für Rechtswissenschaft
- Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel
- Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
- EBS Universität für Wirtschaft und Recht
- Europa-Universität Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder)
- FernUniversität in Hagen
- Freie Universität Berlin
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU)
- Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
- Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
- Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover
- Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
- Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main
- Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
- Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg
- Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
- Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg
- Philipps-Universität Marburg
- Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
- Ruhr-Universität Bochum
- Universität Augsburg
- Universität Bayreuth
- Universität Bielefeld
- Universität Bremen
- Universität des Saarlandes
- Universität Greifswald
- Universität Hamburg
- Universität Heidelberg
- Universität Konstanz
- Universität Leipzig
- Universität Mannheim
- Universität Münster
- Universität Osnabrück
- Universität Passau
- Universität Potsdam
- Universität Regensburg
- Universität Trier
- Universität zu Köln
Exam rules in Germany (17)
- Brandenburg§ 3 Abs. 2 und § 7 BbgJAG i.V.m. § 3 BbgJAO (R = vertieft, G = Grundzüge)
- BerlinBerliner JAG §§ 6 ff. i.V.m. JAO (Berliner Juristenausbildungsordnung vom 04.08.2003), Prüfungsstoff in § 3 JAO
- Baden-Württemberg§ 8 JAPrO vom 02.05.2019 (GBl. 2019 S. 131)
- Bayern§ 18 JAPO (Ausbildungs- und Prüfungsordnung für Juristen vom 13.10.2003, BayRS 2038-3-3-11-J)
- Deutschland (Bund)§ 5a DRiG (Studium), § 5d DRiG (Prüfungen)
- BremenBis 31.03.2023: § 5 JAPG a.F.; ab 01.04.2023: §§ 7, 14 Abs. 3 JAPG i.V.m. Prüfungsgegenstände-Verordnung vom 20.04.2023
- Hessen§§ 6, 7 JAG Hessen (Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 15.03.2004, GVBl. I S. 158)
- Hamburg§ 12 HmbJAG i.V.m. Prüfungsgegenständeverordnung
- Mecklenburg-VorpommernJAG M-V i.V.m. JAPO M-V vom 16.06.2004 (GVOBl. M-V S. 281); Pflichtfächer nach Inhaltsübersicht in § 11 JAPO M-V (unverified)
- Niedersachsen§ 3 Abs. 2 NJAG i.V.m. § 16 NJAVO (Prüfungsstoff der Pflichtfachprüfung)
- Nordrhein-Westfalen§ 11 JAG NRW (Juristenausbildungsgesetz vom 11.03.2003, GV. NRW. S. 135)
- Rheinland-Pfalz§ 1 Abs. 2 JAPO RP vom 06.07.2023 mit Anlage zu § 1 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 (bis Prüfung Februar 2025: Anlage der JAPO vom 01.07.2003)
- Schleswig-Holstein§ 14 JAG SH i.V.m. § 3 JAVO (2014: Kernbereiche in § 3 Abs. 3-6; 2023: Pflichtstoffkatalog als Anlage zu § 3 Abs. 2)
- Saarland§ 8 JAG (Gesetz Nr. 1228 über die juristische Ausbildung idF der Bekanntmachung vom 12.06.2015)
- Sachsen§ 14 Abs. 3 bis 6 SächsJAPO vom 13.09.2021 (bis 08.10.2021: § 14 SächsJAPO idF der Bek. vom 07.04.2006)
- Sachsen-Anhalt§ 14 JAPrVO (Ausbildungs- und Prüfungsverordnung für Juristen vom 02.10.2003) i.V.m. JAG LSA
- Thüringen§ 14 ThürJAPO (Prüfungsstoff) i.V.m. ThürJAG
Switzerland
Exams
- Aargau: Aargau bar examination
- Bern: Bern bar examination
- Basel-Landschaft: Basel-Landschaft bar examination
- Basel-Stadt: Basel-Stadt bar examination
- Genève: Geneva bar examination (final examination)
- Luzern: Lucerne bar examination
- St. Gallen: St. Gallen bar examination
- Vaud: Vaud bar examination
- Zürich: Zurich bar examination
Curricula
- Universität Basel
- Universität Bern
- Universität Luzern
- Universität St. Gallen (HSG)
- Universität Zürich
- Université de Fribourg / Universität Freiburg
- Université de Lausanne (UNIL)
United Kingdom
Exams
- SQE1 Functioning Legal Knowledge assessments (FLK1, FLK2)
- SQE2 practical legal skills assessment (oral and written)
Curricula
- London School of Economics and Political Science
- Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) / Bar Standards Board (BSB)
- University of Cambridge
- University of Oxford
USA
Exams
- California Bar Examination
- Multistate Bar Examination
- Multistate Essay Examination
- Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination
- Multistate Performance Test
- NextGen Uniform Bar Examination
- Uniform Bar Examination
Curricula
- American Bar Association, Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar
- Columbia University
- Harvard Law School
- New York University
- Stanford University
- University of Chicago
- Yale University